Philosophy forum
Philosophy Forum
Decadence
Speaking of decadence ("decadent society," "decadent aristocracy," etc.). Is relevant only if we put it established that the one has fallen or that it is decaying. However, should it be stupid to commit an error as trivial! The decay is well deserved for those who have it, that's all. Me, anyway, I do not complain.
The horrors of World War e
Often we hear, here or there "but how could anyone (from 1939 to 1945) allow such things without reacting? How human beings could they indulge in committing crimes as horrendous? . These questions are legitimate, and reveal the moral chasm that separates our present humanity from that of our grandparents (who are still our friends). And yet, as I leaned on the subject, I became convinced, to my amazement that I knew the answers! I too am able to allow such things without reacting, let me go to commit crimes so appalling! And if you think I'm going tell you my method, you are wrong! Band queer! I am very much alone on the other side of the moral abyss! Fags!
The clean car
We managed today to develop fuel "green" does not reject (or less) of harmful particles during combustion in the engine of the automobile is can "run clean through, for example, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (best known by its acronym: GPL). However, this may hinder - and embarrasses me - in this riot of cleanliness, it is withdraws to the honest man a whole section of driving pleasure, one that is piss poor these jerks pedestrians with black smoke carcinogens well. What
time without morality.
morality in the affairs of the City
As far as we go back in the history of human thought, at least through its written records, the issue of human moral political representative of the people or the common will has always been acute. Can he run the city, the man who in his own affairs demonstrated greed, lightness or lust? To resume a more contemporary vocabulary, the "private sphere" Does it have significant impacts on the "public sphere", should there be a control, a look at the morality of the politician (the word used here in its broadest sense more general)?
As an example, the relative modernity does not overshadow the exemplary value: the former president of the United States of America, Mr. Bill Clinton. In his case, both unique and representative of a whole class of similar situations, world public opinion was it to make judgments based on his marital indiscretions? It a question that I have quite difficult to answer because when I try to think about it, my decision is clouded by visions of that fat slut Monica in the process of sucking greedily, the slut, oh, the mouth full of shit, excuse me, it totally distracts me.
0 comments:
Post a Comment